Visual ontology engineering and cognitive psychology

Keywords: decision making, knowledge structuring, ontological engineering, cognitive style, visual-analytical thinking in business, knowledge management

Abstract

Visual ontology engineering serves as both a decision support tool in business and a methodology for creating corporate knowledge management systems. This paper provides an overview of visual ontology engineering methods, taking into account findings from cognitive psychology. Visual models are understood here as various diagrams, graphs, and sketches intended for subsequent development of ontologies or conceptual models of subject domains, ideas, structures, or processes. Among the known diagrammatic knowledge representation models, ontologies have been selected as the most widespread modeling approach. The paper examines how cognitive style characteristics influence ontology design and learning in the field of ontological engineering. It also addresses the specifics of developing visual-analytical thinking skills and discusses typical errors that arise during the modeling process. The paper may be of interest to business analysts, system architects, and developers of intelligent applications. The recommendations offered are based on the author’s many years of experience teaching courses on “Visual-Analytical Thinking” and “Knowledge Engineering,” as well as conducting ontology engineering trainings in companies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hullman, J. (2019, March 12). The purpose of visualization is insight, not pictures: An interview with visualization pioneer Ben Shneiderman. Medium: Multiple Views: Visualization Research Explained. https://medium.com/multiple-views-visualization-research-explained/the-purpose-of-visualization-is-insight-not-pictures-an-interview-with-visualization-pioneer-ben-beb15b2d8e9b

Ishikawa, T. (2023). Individual differences and skill training in cognitive mapping: How and why people differ. Topics in Cognitive Science, 15(1), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12605

Kholodnaya, M. A. (2002). Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind. Moscow: PER SE. (In Russian).

Solso, R. (2011). Cognitive psychology (Trans. from English). St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russian).

Skotnikova, I. G. (2018). Cognitive-style characteristics of cognitive activity in tasks with uncertainty. Obrazovanie Lichnosti [Personality Education], (2), 60–70. (In Russian).

Gavrilova, T. A., Kudryavцев, D. V., & Muromtsev, D. I. (2020). Knowledge engineering. Models and methods. St. Petersburg: Lan. (In Russian).

Gavrilova, T. A., Kudryavtsev, D. V., & Gorovoy, V. A. (2006). Models and methods of ontology engineering. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskie Vedomosti SPbGPU [St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal], (4), 21–28. (In Russian).

Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008

Otero-Cerdeira, L., Rodríguez-Martínez, F. J., & Gómez-Rodríguez, A. (2015). Ontology matching: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.08.032

Karabulut, E., Pileggi, S. F., Groth, P., & Degeler, V. (2024). Ontologies in digital twins: A systematic literature review. Future Generation Computer Systems, 153, 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.12.013

Shchukarev, I. A. (2023). Features of working with Russian-language ontologies using the Owlready2 library in Python. Software & Systems, 36(2), 223–227.

Fernández, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., & Juristo, N. (1997). METHONTOLOGY: From ontological art towards ontological engineering (AAAI Technical Report SS-97-06). http://oa.upm.es/5484/1/METHONTOLOGY_.pdf

Guizzardi, G., & Mylopoulos, J. (2019). Taking it to the next level: Nicola Guarino, formal ontology and conceptual modeling. Ontology makes sense (pp. 223–241). IOS Press.

Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., Gómez-Pérez, A., & Fernández-López, M. (2012). The NeOn methodology for ontology engineering. Ontology engineering in a networked world (pp. 9–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24794-1_2

Shimizu, C., Hammar, K., & Hitzler, P. (2023). Modular ontology modeling. Semantic Web, 14(3), 459–489. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-222886

Akhmadeeva, I. R., Borovikova, O. I., Zagorulko, Yu. A., & Sidorova, E. A. (2014). An ontological information collection for intelligent scientific internet resources. System Informatics, (3), 13–23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31144/si.2307-6410.2014.n3.p13-23

Gavrilova, T. A., & Strakhovich, E. V. (2020). Visual-analytical thinking and mind maps in ontology engineering. Ontology of Designing, 10(1), 87–99. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2020-10-1-87-99

Gavrilova, T. (2023). Knowledge and data in artificial intelligence: A duel or a duo. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 33(3), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054661823030136

Pospelov, D. A. (1981). Logical-linguistic models in control systems. Energoizdat. (In Russian).

Borgest, N. M. (2018). Ontologies of design from Vitruvius to Wittich. Ontology of Designing, 8(4), 487–522. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2018-8-4-487-522

Borisov, V. V., Bobryakov, A. V., & Misnik, A. E. (2021). Expert systems. Universum. (In Russian).

Van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., & Porter, B. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of knowledge representation. Elsevier.

Zagorulko, Yu. A., & Zagorulko, G. B. (2024). Artificial intelligence. Knowledge engineering: A textbook for universities. Yurayt. (In Russian).

Bova, V. V., Leshchanov, D. V., Kravchenko, D. Yu., & Novikov, A. A. (2014). Computer ontology: Tasks and construction methodology. Informatics, Computer Engineering and Engineering Education, (4), 44–55. (In Russian).

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (1993). Mental models or formal rules? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 368–380.

Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19(1), 29–52.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Vekhorev, M. N., & Panteleev, M. G. (2011). Building repositories for ontological knowledge bases. Software & Systems, (3), 3–8. (In Russian).

Dobrov, B. V., Solovyev, V. D., Ivanov, V. V., & Lukashevich, N. V. (2006). Ontologies and thesauri. INTUIT. (In Russian).

Bhatt, S., Zhao, Q., Sheth, A., & Shalin, V. (2020). Knowledge graphs as a means of improving artificial intelligence. Open Systems. DBMS, (3), 24–26. (In Russian).

Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2021). A survey on knowledge graphs: Representation, acquisition, and applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843

Gómez-Pérez, J., Pan, J., Vetere, G., & Wu, H. (2017). Enterprise knowledge graph. Exploiting linked data and knowledge graphs in large organisations. Springer.

Muromtsev, D., Volchek, D., & Romanov, A. (2019). Industrial knowledge graphs — The intelligent core of the digital economy. Control Engineering Russia, (5), 32–39. (In Russian).

Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., & Taylor, J. (2019). Industry-scale knowledge graphs: Lessons and challenges. Communications of the ACM, 62(8), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3331166

Sheth, A., Avant, D., & Bertram, C. (2001). System and method for creating a semantic web (U.S. Patent No. 6,311,194). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Hyerle, D. (2009). Visual tools for transforming information into knowledge. Corwin.

Inastrilla, C. R. A. (2023). Data visualization in the information society. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 2, 25–29.

McKim, R. H. (1972). Experiences in visual thinking. Brooks/Cole.

Card, S. K., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann.

Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080

Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (2010). The mind map book [Russian translation]. Popurri. (In Russian).

Koznov, D., Larchik, E., Pliskin, M., & Artamonov, N. (2011). Mind maps merging in collaborative work. Programming and Computer Software, 37(6), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1134/S036176881106003X

Chang, C.-C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students' learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377240

Dubrovsky, D. I. (2013). Mental phenomena and the brain. Ripol Klassik. (In Russian).

Jeffery, A. B., Maes, J. D., & Bratton-Jeffery, M. F. (2005). Improving team decision-making performance with collaborative modeling. Team Performance Management, 11(1/2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590510584311

Velichkovsky, B. M. (2006). Cognitive science: Foundations of the psychology of cognition (Vols. 1–2). Smysl. (In Russian).

Bruner, J. (1977). Psychology of cognition [Russian translation]. Progress. (In Russian).

Gavrilova, T. A., & Leshcheva, I. A. (2016). Cognitive style and the formation of conceptual knowledge structures. Psychology, 13(1), 154–176. (In Russian).

Strogovich, M. S. (2021). Logic. URSS. (In Russian).

Kosikhin, V. V. (2012). Psychological content and diagnosis of the "Range of Equivalence" cognitive style. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(2), 116–131. (In Russian).

Gangemi, A., & Presutti, V. (2009). Ontology design patterns. Handbook on ontologies (pp. 221–243). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10

Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600402

Effinger, P., Jogsch, N., & Seiz, S. (2010). On a study of layout aesthetics for business process models using BPMN. International Workshop on Business Process Modeling Notation (pp. 31–45). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16298-5_5

Dneprovskaya, N. V., & Shevtsova, I. V. (2023). Knowledge management system in strategic university management. Business Informatics, 17(2), 20–40. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2023.2.20.40

Zaramenskikh, E. P., Kudryavtsev, D. V., & Arzumanyan, M. Yu. (2023). Enterprise architecture: A textbook for universities (2nd ed.). Yurayt. (In Russian).

Babkin, E. A., Belova, Yu. A., & Krivenko, A. A. (2020). Development and use of a conceptual model for an educational program recommendation system. Digital education. 21st century: Proceedings of the 3rd International Practical Conference (pp. 19–24). (In Russian).

Moiseeva, T. V., & Mukhanov, Yu. S. (2020). On methods of actors' knowledge visualization in intersubjective management of problem situation resolution. Vestnik of Samara State Technical University. Technical Sciences Series, 65(1), 62–73. (In Russian).

Russo, D., & Mura, G. (2023). The financial data services domain: From taxonomies to ontologies. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 23(1), 17–28. https://articlearchives.co/index.php/JAF/article/view/5765

Malik, S., Jain, S., & Sharma, G. (2025). FNN-ONTOCOM: A hybrid cost estimation approach using fuzzy and neural network for ontology engineering. Computational Intelligence, 41(3), e70061. https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.70061

Doumanas, D., Bouchouras, G., Soularidis, A., Kotis, K., & Vouros, G. (2025). From human- to LLM-centered collaborative ontology engineering. Applied Ontology, 19(4), 334–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/15705838241305067

Kravchenko, T. K., & Isaev, D. V. (2024). Decision support systems: A textbook and workshop for universities (2nd ed.). Yuray. (In Russian).

Published
2026-09-30
How to Cite
GavrilovaT. A. (2026). Visual ontology engineering and cognitive psychology. Business Informatics, 20(3), 29-46. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587-814X.2026.3.29.46
Section
Articles